About Me

I've never not aced it in school / compliance. But what I didn't do was try to make money from a young age. To me that is what you do when you can't work out what it is you really love "regardless of the money".
That doesn't make me special, but then, some would argue "there is no true identicality" and others would argue "there is no true uniqueness". Somewhere in the borders between worlds, we live.
"To be, or not to be, that is the question."
To do or not to do, that is my answer.
And as an aside, when you plug that quote into a search engine you get more identical results than any other query. And yet none seem to have answered the question.
And yet, is it better or worse for mental health when people are now more likely to kill themselves than to kill others.
Similarly, as we (morally) 'progress' into the future, ask yourself this: do we become more accepting of things that were once wrong, or do we declare more things wrong that were once acceptable.
And it is that (moral) dilemma that epitomises (moral) dilemmas. Instead we focus on trilemmas like "security" "scalability" or "decentralisation" (cryptocurrencies), or "quality" "costly" and "speed" (business/consumer-product).
So that brings me to the concept of an infilemma. Infinite categorical distinctions with which we can only have one less.
See how I'm following my own golden rule